0 votes
1 view
in Java by (2.6k points)

I wonder if there is a special reason in Java for using always "extends" rather than "implements" for defining bounds of typeparameters.

Example:

public interface C {}

public class A<B implements C>{} 

is prohibited but

public class A<B extends C>{} 

is correct. What is the reason for that?

1 Answer

0 votes
by (46.1k points)
There is no denotative variation in the general restraint language between whether a class 'implements' or 'extends'. The constraint circumstances are 'extends' and 'super' - that is, is this class to work with assignable to that different one (extends), or is this class assignable of that one (super).
Welcome to Intellipaat Community. Get your technical queries answered by top developers !


Categories

...