Measurement System Analysis (MSA) is an essential process for measuring accuracy, consistency, and reliability in the data collection systems. It ensures that measurements are accurate and consistent, so they can be used confidently to make quality and process improvement decisions. Errors, usage methods, and measurement units can all impact the system’s results. This is vital because trusted measurement systems and data can reduce error rates, increase efficiency, and ensure product quality. In this blog, you will learn about MSA, the procedures, types of MSA, tools, and different industry applications and benefits.
Table of Contents:
What is Measurement System Analysis (MSA)?
MSA (Measurement System Analysis) helps check if our measurements are accurate and reliable. It ensures that both the measuring tools and the method give consistent and correct results. In short, MSA shows whether the data we use for quality decisions can be trusted.
MSA is critical when:
- New measuring equipment or software is introduced.
- Changes are made to existing measurement systems.
- New operators or inspectors begin using the equipment.
- A quality issue is suspected to be caused by measurement error.
- There’s a need to validate data accuracy before process improvement.
You should conduct a Measurement System Analysis (MSA) in the following situations:
- As part of routine equipment calibration or quality audits.
- Before introducing a new measurement system or gage.
- When measurement data is being used for decision-making.
- During quality improvement projects (e.g., Six Sigma or Lean).
- If multiple operators are collecting the same type of data.
- When measurements appear inconsistent despite process control.
Types of Measurement System Analysis
The MSA types can all be broken into categories depending on the type of data:
1. Variable MSA
- Used for continuous, numeric data such as length, weight, or temperature.
- Commonly uses Gage R&R studies to assess accuracy and consistency.
2. Attribute MSA
- Applies to binary or categorical data like pass/fail or yes/no outcomes.
- Uses Attribute Agreement Analysis to evaluate decision consistency.
3. Destructive Testing MSA
- Used when the part is damaged or destroyed during measurement, such as in crash tests.
- Essential when repeated measurements on the same item are not possible.
4. Automated System MSA
- Checks the performance of automated systems like sensors or machines.
- Ensures the automated measurements are consistent and working as expected.
Why is Measurement System Analysis Important?
If you have an error in your measurement system, all decisions based upon that data could be wrong.
This could lead to:
- Poor quality products
- Unhappy customers
- Loss of revenue
MSA is important because it allows you to:
- Identify and correct errors within your measurement tool or process
- Improve the quality of your products
- Help you make better decisions for your business through accurate data
Master General Management: Lead with Strategy and Skill
Gain leadership, operations, and quality skills to excel in modern management roles.
MSA in Quality Management
In quality management, the main objective is to improve products and services. Companies accomplish this by utilizing tools such as Six Sigma, Lean Manufacturing, and ISO Standards. All of these tools rely on using accurate and dependable data. Therefore, if the data are unreliable, the tools will not function properly and provide wrong results. That’s where Measurement System Analysis (MSA) comes to the rescue.
MSA evaluates whether the instruments and methods used to collect measurement data have reliability and consistency. More simply, it answers the question, “Can we trust the data we are using to assess quality?”
For example, if you are measuring the size of a part using a caliper, an MSA can provide you with answers to the following four questions:
- Is the caliper functioning properly?
- Does the same operator get the same result every time?
- Do different operators get the same result?
- Is there too much variation in the measurements?
If the measurement system isn’t reliable, you might reject a good product or approve a bad one. This can hurt product quality and reduce customer satisfaction.
Measurement Systems Analysis Fundamentals
A measurement system includes more than just the tool or instrument. It involves everything used to take a measurement. To get accurate and precise data, we need to consider the whole system, not only the device.
Below are the components of a measurement system:
1. Instrument/Tool: The device that measures the data for the result. The tool must be working well, properly calibrated, and in good condition, so that it can provide reliable readings.
2. Operator: The person taking the measurement. Different people may use the same tool differently, which can lead to changes in the results.
3. Measured Part: The product or sample to be measured. There could be variations or changes between the parts (in terms of shape, surface, etc.) that can affect the measurement. MSA considers whether the measurement system can account for the variations between parts.
4. Environment: The physical conditions during measurement, such as temperature, humidity, lighting, and vibration, can affect accuracy and precision. MSA considers these factors to ensure the system gives reliable results in different settings.
MSA helps us evaluate the following:
- If the tool is giving correct readings.
- If the operator is using the tool properly.
- If the results stay the same or change under certain conditions.
Measurement System Error
Measurement can involve errors. When you’re measuring, you can and will have errors. This is called the measurement error, and measurement error typically comes in two common types:
- Accuracy (Bias): The closeness of your measurement to the correct or true value.
- Precision (Variation): The consistency of your measurements when done repeatedly.
In addition to accuracy and precision, there are two more important aspects to consider:
- Repeatability: The ability of the same person using the same tool to get the same result consistently.
- Reproducibility: The ability of different people using the same tool to get the same result.
MSA will help you figure out whether or not these errors exist and what impact or influence they might have on your data.
Get 100% Hike!
Master Most in Demand Skills Now!
Procedure of MSA: Gage R&R Study
Gage R&R is an abbreviation for Repeatability and Reproducibility. It is one of the most widely used approaches in Measurement System Analysis (MSA). It is used to check the reliability of the measurement system. The main goal of a Gage R&R study is to find out where the change and variation are coming from. Whether it comes from parts, the measurement operator, or the tool used to measure.
Steps Involved in a Gage R&R Study
Let’s explore the steps involved:
Step 1: Select Parts
Begin by choosing a set of parts to measure, ideally ten or more. These parts should represent the full range of variation you expect to see in actual production. Including a variety of sizes or types ensures your measurement system is tested under realistic conditions.
Step 2: Select Operators
Choose two or three trained operators who normally perform the measurements in your process. These should be people familiar with the tools and procedures. This helps ensure that the study reflects how things work on the shop floor during regular operations.
Step 3: Take Multiple Measurements
Ask each operator to measure every selected part several times. They should not see their previous measurements or anyone else’s results. This helps check whether the same person can get consistent results each time they measure the same part.
Step 4: Analyze Repeatability and Reproducibility
After collecting all the measurement data, use tools like Excel or Minitab to break it down. You will look at variation from three sources. First is part-to-part variation, which is the natural difference between the parts. Then comes repeatability, which is the variation when the same person measures the same part multiple times. Finally, reproducibility looks at the variation when different people measure the same part.
Step 5: Interpret Results
Now review where the variation is coming from. Most of it should come from the parts themselves. If there is a lot of variation caused by the operators or the measuring tools, that is a sign that your system may need improvement. Gage R and R helps you spot problems in your measurement process so you can make changes and improve quality.
Importance of Gage R&R Analysis
- It’s normal and expected that the majority of the variance comes from the parts.
- If there is a lot of variation from the operator or tool, your measurement system needs to be improved.
- Gage R&R will help you find weaknesses in the measurement system so that you can fix them and improve quality control.
What Attribute Agreement Analysis Measures
1. Agreement Between Appraisers (Operators): It measures whether different people provide the same result on the same item.
Example: If three inspectors inspect the same item, do they all say “Pass”?
2. Repeatability (Same Person, Same Item): It measures whether the same person provides the same result every time they inspect the same item.
Example: If one person inspects the same part twice, do they arrive at the same decision on both inspections?
3. Agreement with the Known Standard: This checks if the appraiser’s decisions match the correct result or the standard reference.
Example: If we already know a product is “Good”, did the inspector say “Good”?
Industries That Benefit from MSA
The following industries depend on MSA to ensure quality and consistency:
- Manufacturing Companies: To ensure that every part or product meets exact design, quality, and safety specifications during production.
- Healthcare Organizations: For delivering accurate diagnostic results through medical devices, lab tests, and patient monitoring tools.
- Pharmaceutical Companies: To maintain precision and repeatability in laboratory testing, drug formulation, and batch quality control.
- Service Industries: To ensure the reliability of data collected from surveys, audits, checklists, and customer feedback systems.
- Government and Defense Sectors: To meet strict regulatory standards, ensure system accuracy, and support critical safety or compliance decisions.
What are the Acceptance Criteria for MSA?
To validate a measurement system, it’s important to take into account how much error and variation it adds to the results. These criteria will guide your judgement regarding a system’s level of confidence to be used for quality checking
1. For Gage R&R (Used with Numerical Data)
The % Gage R&R is used to find out how much of the total variation comes from the measurement system.
- 0-10% (excellent): Essentially, the system is highly accurate and reliable. It is acceptable for nearly all uses.
- 10-30%(may be acceptable): The system may be acceptable depending on the application, but it would be best to improve if possible.
- >30%(not acceptable): The system is contributing too much variability. It should be improved before using it for decisions.
2. For Attribute Agreement Analysis (Used with Categorical Data like Pass/Fail)
Here we examine the percentage of agreement, which describes the frequency of correct results or matching a known answer.
- Greater than 90% (Good): The measurement system is reliably consistent, and it is producing accurate results.
- 80% to 90% (Need Improvements): The system is partially reliable, but it also needs improvements to be more accurate.
- Less than 80%(Unacceptable): The system is not reliable. Too many errors are being produced, and changes need to be made.
- Minitab: Utilized frequently for performing Gage R&R and attribute agreement analysis, and has a simple interface.
- JMP: Advanced statistical software with notable interactive data analysis and use of visualization.
- Excel with add-ins: Good for performing basic MSA easily with additional tools or formulas.
- SPC for Excel: Provides user-friendly templates for performing MSA in Microsoft Excel.
- QI Macros: An add-in for Excel with simple tools that has good quality control tools and MSA applications.
- Statgraphics: Offers a wide variety of tools for statistical analysis and has MSA capabilities.
- SigmaXL: Excel-based software that has many applications for Six Sigma and MSA.
Real-Life Examples of MSA
Example 1: Precision Engineering – Inconsistent Bore Measurements
A precision engineering company noticed inconsistent readings in the bore diameter of a critical component, even though the process was statistically in control. To investigate, they performed a Gage R&R study involving three operators and one digital caliper. The analysis revealed that one operator applied inconsistent pressure during measurement, causing variation. After retraining the operators and standardizing the measuring technique, the measurement variation dropped significantly, reducing rework by 25% and improving product consistency.
Example 2: Automotive Assembly – Variation in Torque Measurement
An automotive plant experienced quality issues due to inconsistent torque readings during assembly. Although all tools were calibrated, the measurements varied between shifts. A Measurement System Analysis revealed that operators were using slightly different torque techniques, and some tools had worn-out components. After replacing faulty tools and enforcing a standardized torque procedure, the measurement variation reduced, leading to better assembly consistency and fewer warranty claims.
Challenges in Conducting MSA and How to Overcome Them
- Poorly Trained Operators: Provide more training on measurement procedures and the use of tools. Schedule ongoing classes, refreshers to keep all operators consistent and skilled.
- Inconsistent Measurement Procedures: Develop and mandate standardized measurement procedures. Take the guesswork out of the procedures by giving each operator written instructions as an obligation.
- Wrong/Worn Tools: Create a calibration and preventive maintenance program for all measurement tools. Replace old or broken tools as needed to keep up the accuracy.
- Resistance to Change or Extra Work: To reduce resistance, communicate clearly with operators or employees. Explain how MSA improves product quality, reduces rework, and boosts customer satisfaction. Use real-life examples to show the actual benefits.
- Misinterpret MSA Results: Provide training on how to read MSA reports, looking for outliers, and statistically comparing MSA results in some examples. Utilize visuals and easy-to-understand methods (EXCEL, Minitab) so data analysis will be simple and a support tool in decision making.
Conclusion
Measurement System Analysis (MSA) can be a valuable tool in quality management. It verifies that the data used for making decisions is reliable and accurate. Whether you are a manufacturer or a service provider, MSA can help you reduce mistakes and errors, improve your processes, and ultimately provide better products and services to your customers. With the correct methods, tools, and training, any organization can benefit from MSA.
Take the next step in your career with our General Management Course and gain practical skills to lead teams, make strategic decisions, and drive business success.
Check the other general management-related blogs:
Measurement System Analysis: Importance, Types, and Applications – FAQs
Q1. What is Measurement System Analysis (MSA)?
MSA is a method used to check if your measurement system is accurate, consistent, and reliable.
Q2. Why is Measurement System Analysis important in quality control?
It ensures that decisions made using measurement data are based on trustworthy results.
Q3. What is Gage R&R in Measurement System Analysis?
Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (Gage R&R) is a key MSA tool used to evaluate variation caused by the measurement device and operators
Q4. When should a Measurement System Analysis be performed?
MSA should be conducted when new equipment is introduced, during quality projects, or when data is used for critical decisions.
Q5. How can Measurement System Analysis reduce measurement errors?
MSA identifies sources of variation, allowing teams to correct issues like inconsistent operator techniques or faulty instruments.