SQL NOLOCK: Working, Risks, and Safer Alternatives

When you are working with SQL Server, performance issues like query blocking and long wait times are common, specifically in high-traffic databases. One popular solution that developers opt for is the SQL NOLOCK hint in their queries. It allows queries to read data without waiting for locks. This significantly improves speed and concurrency. But there are some drawbacks to using NOLOCK as well that you must be aware of before depending on it.  

This article will explain how SQL NOLOCK works, when it helps, along with the risks it introduces. We will also discuss the safer alternatives and how to detect and fix problems caused by them.

What is SQL NOLOCK?

SQL NOLOCK is a table hint that is commonly used in Microsoft SQL Server. It allows a query to read data without acquiring shared locks. It also prevents being blocked by exclusive locks held by other transactions.

A lock is used in SQL to control how multiple users (or queries) can access the same data at the same time. Extending further, a shared lock is used when a user is reading the data. It makes sure that no write happens on the data that is being read until the read is finished. 

When you use WITH (NOLOCK) in a SELECT statement, SQL Server reads data without taking shared locks or waiting for exclusive locks to be released. It tells the SQL Server to allow a query to read pages and rows that may be changed by other transactions. While WITH (NOLOCK) can reduce wait times, it comes at the cost of data accuracy and consistency. Let us discuss more about the NOLOCK hint in SQL in the later sections. 

Master SQL - From Beginner to Pro

Interactive lessons, real-world projects, live Q&A, and a certificate to showcase your skills.

Explore Program

How SQL NOLOCK Works Internally?

Under normal circumstances, when a query reads data, SQL Server acquires shared locks on the rows or pages being read. These locks ensure that no other transaction can modify the data until the read is complete, preserving consistency. Similarly, when data is being modified, exclusive locks are taken to prevent other transactions from reading or modifying that data simultaneously. 

As we have discussed above, WITH(NOLOCK) ignores or skips the locks to read data that has been written but not committed to the server yet. It is possible because SQL NOLOCK directly reads uncommitted data from the buffer cache or data pages, even if they are being modified by other transactions.

Note that using the SQL NOLOCK hint:

• does not guarantee a consistent snapshot across multiple reads, so the result can mix data from different points in time.
• Some internal operations still require lightweight locks (for metadata or allocation), so NOLOCK is not a complete “lock-free” guarantee.

SQL NOLOCK Syntax and Usage Examples

Let us look at the syntax of SQL NOLOCK with the help of hypothetical situations. 

Simple syntax of SQL NOLOCK is:

SELECT CustomerID, OrderDate, Total
FROM dbo.Orders WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE OrderDate >= '2025-01-01';

When using no lock with multiple tables, the syntax is as follows:

SELECT c.CustomerID, c.Name, o.OrderID
FROM dbo.Customers c WITH (NOLOCK)
JOIN dbo.Orders o WITH (NOLOCK) ON o.CustomerID = c.CustomerID;

A few things to note regarding the SQL NOLOCK Syntax are: 

• WITH (NOLOCK) is a table hint that applies to the table referenced in that part of the FROM clause.
• It does not prevent schema locks or other minimal internal locks.
• Always avoid mixing NOLOCK with UPDATE and DELETE statements, as this hint is only meaningful for reads.

Benefits of Using NOLOCK in SQL Server

The reasons why SQL NOLOCK is used in SQL Server are:

• Lower blocking: Since, through WITH(NOLOCK) hint, the query does not acquire any shared locks, they don’t block writers and vice versa.
• Reduced wait times for reporting queries: Using NOLOCK helps long-running reports or dashboards execute faster. This is especially true when slight data inconsistencies are acceptable.
• Simplicity: Applying NOLOCK can be an alternative way to minimize the blocking, especially on those tables that are frequently accessed. This way, multiple queries can read data concurrently without waiting for locks.
• Temporary relief: It can be used as a short-term fix while optimizing queries, indexes, or database design.

However, you should always keep in mind the dirty reads issue with using SQL NOLOCK. The performance gain should be balanced against the risk of inaccurate data, especially in critical applications like finance or inventory systems. Faster queries are not always useful if they return incorrect results, 

Risks and Data Anomalies Caused by NOLOCK

A SQL NOLOCK query can read data that is not yet committed, rolled back, or partially updated. These reads are referred to as dirty reads. The primary risk of using NOLOCK is dirty reads, but that is not all. There are a few more anomalies that can be created by NOLOCK.

• Non-repeatable reads: Re-reading the same row in the same query or transaction may return different values.
• Phantom reads: Rows can appear or disappear between reads.
• Missing or duplicate rows: During page splits or row movement, NOLOCK reads can skip rows or read the same row twice, causing incorrect aggregates.
• Partially written values: For very wide updates that span multiple pages, you might read a partially updated representation (rare but possible).
• Schema stability caveats: Certain DDL operations or online index operations can interact with NOLOCK readers unpredictably.

All of these reasons are what make NOLOCK not suitable for financial databases, inventory counts, or basically anything that must be 100% accurate.

Edge Cases and System Interactions

While NOLOCK can boost performance, its behavior is not always straightforward. Some database features interact with it in ways that can lead to unpredictable outcomes.

• Triggers and indexed views: The use of NOLOCK does not change how triggers work or how to determine correctness for indexed views. The possibility of the unwanted effects of concurrent activity can still yield confusing results.
• Always On Availability groups and replication: Read-intent connections to secondaries (replicas) are a much safer alternative to NOLOCK when offloading reporting from the primary. Secondary replicas can also be configured in the availability group as read workloads.
• Online index rebuilds: Applying online operations can reduce blocking, but doing so with NOLOCK reads can return results in an intermediate state.
• Snapshot-based isolation: If the database is operating in snapshot isolation or using RCSI (Read Committed Snapshot Isolation), most of what NOLOCK tries to avoid has already been provided without reading uncommitted data.
• Large scans and page splits: When there are a lot of concurrent modifications made to rows, using NOLOCK will increase the chance very significantly that, depending on the timing, the user thread will either miss rows or retrieve duplicate rows.

Performance Considerations

While SQL NOLOCK can enhance concurrency and decrease blocking, its performance implications vary based on the type of workloads and queries being run. SQL NOLOCK:

• Does not help with I/O: If your query is I/O-bound, which means that it uses much of its time reading from disk, using NOLOCK will not improve the speed of your query much. The overhead from disk access is actually more than the offset time that NOLOCK saves. 
• Reduces contention in CPU-constrained workloads: If there are multiple sessions active for the same resource, then using NOLOCK is feasible. This improves the responsiveness of your session.
• Can increase downstream work: The downside to faster reads is that if your query results are incorrect, you may have to run those same queries again or manually reconcile the incorrect results. This may affect a business process, which may negate any performance gained by using NOLOCK.
• Masking performance issues: Using NOLOCK constantly will mask real issues such as missing indexes, inefficient query structure, or incorrectly specified isolation levels. Resolving these issues will help in the long term and is a more efficient solution of efficiency.
• Consistent Results Monitoring: Assess your environment for the effect of WITH(NOLOCK) under a realistic workload in a test environment. Validate with your performance monitoring tools whether NOLOCK is demonstrating less latency and improved throughput performance in your environment.

Best Practices and Governance Guidelines

If you use SQL NOLOCK, be sure to establish clear governance over its appropriate and consistent use across projects. The principles below help establish the right balance between performance and data accuracy:

• Policy: Have a clear organizational policy that specifies where NOLOCK is allowed (e.g., non-critical reporting or analytics) and where it shouldn’t be used (e.g., financial, billing, or inventory systems).
• Code Review: Code reviews should be required on any query that specifies WITH (NOLOCK). Each NOLOCK must be substantiated by a justification for its use and data testing verifying the reliability of the data.
• Prefer RCSI: Unless there are analytical constraints requiring NOLOCK, specify RCSI (Read Committed Snapshot Isolation Mode) at the database level, as it often provides similar performance and prevents uncommitted data from being read.
• Documentation: Whenever any NOLOCK operation is specified in code, add comments explaining its use, including an acceptable range of inaccuracy related to that NOLOCK. This will help future developers understand the decision-making.
• Restrict Application: If it becomes necessary to use the NOLOCK hint, it should only be applied to the necessary tables without using a session-level READ UNCOMMITTED, unless justifiably done. 
• Ongoing Monitoring: Track queries that use a NOLOCK hint and document the business processes that utilize them. This will limit the negative implications of any inconsistencies by highlighting potential issues earlier. 
• Automated Monitoring: If possible, utilize static analysis tools or CI/CD rules that flag and disallow any new NOLOCK hints from being merged into production.

Teams can utilize SQL NOLOCK in a sufficiently safe manner while continuing to leverage the performance benefits of the hint by adhering to these guidelines.

Monitoring and Testing for NOLOCK Issues

Monitoring the use of WITH (NOLOCK) and where it is used will help you catch risks early, and even verify that it is actually improving performance. SQL Server provides a variety of tools and views to make this a little easier for you to check. Whenever you are going to use NOLOCK in production, be sure to test it in a staging or development environment with real or realistic data. Then you can compare the results of the query with NOLOCK and without to make sure the differences are acceptable. You can also validate performance while simulating concurrent transactions to see how your queries react with updates and reads happening at the same time.

• For example, you can use Dynamic Management Views (DMVs) like sys.dm_exec_query_stats and sys.dm_exec_sql_text to identify queries that are incorporating the NOLOCK hint.
• The Query Store and Extended Events are used to track query performance and to find or notice NOLOCK queries that yield unpredictable or inconsistent results regularly.

By consistently monitoring and controlled testing, you can ensure that NOLOCK is helping, without introducing stealth data quality issues.

Detecting and Fixing NOLOCK-Related Data Issues

NOLOCK queries can result in data presentation anomalies such as lost rows, duplicate rows, and inaccurate total calculations. Quickly identifying and addressing these discrepancies is important if you expect any numbers in your reports or applications to be accurate. 

• To start identifying discrepancies, look across tables and reports that read from the same underlying data without expecting information to identify if information appears to be missing. For example, a sales total appearing in a detailed query may suddenly not equal the calculation in a report.  
• If this occurs, it may very well be that values were read in a NOLOCK query using part of the transaction or uncommitted data being rolled back.  
• Use checksums or count queries to help isolate the two table outputs for comparison and flag the discrepancy.
• If you find discrepancies between the tables or reports, independently rerun the affected queries and use NOLOCK or after the related transaction is committed. If it still persists, try another approach to get the data out instead of using NOLOCK queries.

Safer Alternatives to SQL NOLOCK

There are other safer alternatives to SQL NOLOCK that you can use that allow for data accuracy while offering improved performance.

• Read Committed Snapshot Isolation (RCSI): This isolation provides statement-level consistency without taking shared locks. It uses versioned rows saved in tempdb to prevent dirty reads and blocking. If you are looking for the ideal isolation level for reporting workloads, this isolation level is a good candidate.
• Snapshot Isolation: This isolation level provides a transaction-level view of the data as of the time the transaction began. It guarantees consistent and repeatable reads without blocking concurrent updates.
• Read Replicas or Secondary Databases: You can offload heavy analytical queries to read-only in cases of using replication subscribers. Shifting just the READ workload to a different database can reduce load and locking contention on the primary database. 
• Query/Index Optimization: In many cases, we can improve performance simply by providing the proper indexes. Also, we can have statistics updated as necessary, and rewrite inefficient queries so we avoid a full table scan. 
• Efficient Transaction Design: In general, you want to keep transactions as brief and focused as possible. This helps avoid locks that extend out over multiple code execution paths and potentially bottleneck activity. For example, avoid waiting for user interaction within a transaction, and commit changes as quickly as possible for best concurrency.

Implementation of SQL NOLOCK

SQL WITH (NOLOCK) is frequently used when you want speed and concurrency over accurate data. It helps avoid situations where blocking read operations occur while a transaction takes a lot of time.  Let us understand this with the help of an example. Later, we will discuss where it is typically applied in day-to-day life.

Example

This SQL code shows how WITH (NOLOCK) behaves in two transactions running simultaneously. The data will be updated in one transaction, while reading will occur in another transaction.

-- Create a sample table
CREATE TABLE Orders (
    OrderID INT PRIMARY KEY,
    CustomerName VARCHAR(50),
    OrderStatus VARCHAR(20)
);

-- Insert some sample data
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES (1, 'Alice', 'Pending');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES (2, 'Bob', 'Pending');
INSERT INTO Orders VALUES (3, 'Charlie', 'Pending');

-- ==============================
-- TRANSACTION 1: Update in Progress
-- ==============================
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
UPDATE Orders
SET OrderStatus = 'Completed'
WHERE OrderID = 1;


-- ==============================
-- TRANSACTION 2: Reading Data
-- ==============================

-- Normal SELECT (this will wait because the first transaction is holding a lock)
SELECT * FROM Orders;

-- Same SELECT using NOLOCK (this will not wait, but may read uncommitted data)
SELECT * FROM Orders WITH (NOLOCK);

-- ===========================================
-- Once done, go back to Transaction 1 and COMMIT
-- ===========================================
COMMIT;

Output:

Explanation:

In the example, we have two transactions working at the same time. 

• Transaction 1 updates an order status to ‘Completed’ and then waits before committing the transaction, thus locking that row. 
• When Transaction 2 attempts to read the same data, the normal SELECT query must wait until the lock is released, while the SELECT … WITH (NOLOCK) query returns immediately, even though it may read the uncommitted “Completed” value. This allows the read to be optimized under increased concurrency.

Common Real-World Examples of SQL NOLOCK

Here are some of the most common scenarios where WITH (NOLOCK) is preferred. 

• Ad-Hoc or Exploratory Reporting: Business analysts running report-style queries, or exploratory queries, will often use WITH (NOLOCK). This avoids locking down a major production workload.
• High-Traffic Read-Only Dashboards: Real-time dashboards that refresh often can afford some inconsistency if it means they will be faster. These include live sales counters or monitoring dashboards.
• Large Data Warehousing Comparisons: In data warehouse operations, where real-time accuracy is not important, NOLOCK makes queries faster. This is due to reduced contention in these high-volume archival datasets.
• Monitoring Queries: Queries that are just checking a job status, queue length, or other operational metrics without waiting for transactions.
• Non-Critical Engines: Look-up style applications that do not depend on guaranteed consistency can simplify the routing pathways to avoid performance blocking using WITH (NOLOCK).

Kickstart Your SQL Journey – 100% Free

Structured lessons, real query practice, and solid foundations at zero cost.

Explore Program

Conclusion

The use of SQL NOLOCK can improve performance in reporting environments, but NOLOCK should never be used as a substitute for poorly written queries or inadequate indexing. Although NOLOCK will reduce blocking and speed up queries, it will also produce inaccurate, incomplete, or inconsistent data. Therefore, using this when data accuracy is an important factor in the system design is not advised.

Before using NOLOCK, it is necessary to test its impact on data accuracy and consider safer options, such as Read Committed Snapshot Isolation or Snapshot Isolation. When it is used properly and monitored appropriately, NOLOCK could provide temporary performance benefits. Although, careful use and governance of NOLOCK is key to establishing a reliable SQL environment.

SQL NOLOCK – FAQs