The Cyber Appellate Tribunal (CAT) was set up under the Information Technology Act of 2000 to hear appeals against orders made under that Act. However, the Cyber Appellate Tribunal is no longer a tribunal. Beginning on 26 May 2017, the Finance Act of 2017 changed the Information Technology Act. Named the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) as the Appellate Tribunal for matters under the Information Technology Act.
This article explains the history of the Cyber Appellate Tribunal, its structure and powers, TDSAT’s current role, the appeal process under the Information Technology Act, and the bar on civil court jurisdiction.
What Was the Cyber Appellate Tribunal?
The Cyber Appellate Tribunal (CAT) was an appellate body set up under the Information Technology Act of 2000. CAT gave parties a forum to challenge certain orders issued under the Information Technology Act.
CAT handled orders made by the Controller. It also adjudicated officers under the Information Technology Act.
CAT was not a court that punished cybercriminals. CAT’s main job was to review appeals and make decisions. CAT also had powers like a civil court when deciding cases in its area.
Is the Cyber Appellate Tribunal Still Active?
No. The Cyber Appellate Tribunal is no longer functioning. Starting on 26 May 2017, the Finance Act of 2017 amended the Information Technology Act. Named TDSAT as the Appellate Tribunal for the IT Act.
Therefore, CAT is mainly a tribunal, while TDSAT is the current Appellate Tribunal for matters under the Information Technology Act.
What Happened to the Cyber Appellate Tribunal?
The original Section 48 of the Information Technology Act of 2000 created the Cyber Appellate Tribunal.
The Finance Act of 2017 later changed the tribunal framework. From 26 May 2017, TDSAT became the Appellate Tribunal for the IT Act.
Because of this change, references to CAT in books, articles, judgments, or legal documents may refer to the tribunal that existed before 2017. For matters under the Information Technology Act, the relevant body is TDSAT.
| Aspect | Earlier Position | Current Position |
|---|
| Appellate body | Cyber Appellate Tribunal (CAT) | Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) |
| Governing framework | IT Act, 2000 and related provisions | IT Act, 2000 as amended |
| Status | Historical | Current |
| Appellate role | Heard specified IT Act appeals | TDSAT exercises the relevant appellate jurisdiction |
Historical Establishment and Structure of CAT
CAT began under the Information Technology Act of 2000. The Information Technology (Amendment) Act of 2008 later changed the tribunal framework.
The old procedural rules also included the Cyber Regulations Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules of 2000. Rule 13 said that CAT usually sat in New Delhi but could sit elsewhere when needed.
Because the CAT framework changed in 2017, provisions about composition, qualifications, tenure, and removal are no longer current law.
Historical Composition of CAT
CAT used to have a Chairperson and Members appointed under the Information Technology Act.
The Act set eligibility rules for these positions requiring experience and expertise in information technology and related fields. The Act also dealt with tenure, resignation, and removal.
These rules are historical. Do not describe the present appellate structure under TDSAT.
Historical Removal Provisions
The old CAT framework had safeguards for removing its Chairperson and Members. Removal required proof of misconduct or incapacity, an inquiry by a Supreme Court Judge, and a chance for the person to be heard.
These safeguards applied to the CAT framework and do not apply to the current appointment or removal rules for TDSAT.
Current Role of TDSAT Under the IT Act
TDSAT today acts as the Appellate Tribunal under the Information Technology Act. An appeal under the IT Act normally does not start directly before the Appellate Tribunal. Section 57 allows appeals against orders made by the Controller or an adjudicating officer.
The usual appellate path is: Controller or Adjudicating Officer → TDSAT as Appellate Tribunal → High Court on a question of law. The exact remedy depends on the type of order and the specific provisions that apply.
Powers and Procedure of the Appellate Tribunal
Section 58 of the Information Technology Act of 2000 outlines the Appellate Tribunal’s procedure and powers.
Procedure of the Appellate Tribunal
Under Section 58(1), the Appellate Tribunal is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure of 1908. Instead, the Appellate Tribunal follows principles of justice and the rules set in the Information Technology Act. This allows the Appellate Tribunal to use a procedure while ensuring fairness for all parties.
Court‑Like Powers
Section 58(2) gives the Appellate Tribunal powers similar to those of a civil court for certain matters while deciding an appeal. These powers include:
- Summoning and enforcing the attendance of people and examining them on oath
- Requiring the discovery and production of documents or other material objects, including records
- Receiving evidence on affidavits
- Issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents
- Reviewing its decisions
- Dismissing an application for default or deciding it ex parte
- Handling other prescribed matters
These powers allow the Appellate Tribunal to examine evidence and documents relevant to an appeal and decide matters within its jurisdiction.
Judicial Proceedings
Section 58(3) treats proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal as proceedings for certain purposes. It also treats the Appellate Tribunal as a court for other purposes.
Legal update: Section 58(3) still mentions the Indian Penal Code of 1860 and the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1973. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, both effective from 1 July 2024, replaced those frameworks subject to savings and transitional rules. For a case, check the applicable law for the proceeding.
Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal Under Section 57 of the IT Act
Section 57 of the Information Technology Act allows appeals to the Appellate Tribunal against orders made under the Act. An appeal can be filed against an order made by the Controller or an adjudicating officer subject to the rules and limits in the Act. Now, TDSAT exercises this jurisdiction.
Time Limit for Filing an Appeal
An appeal should normally be filed within 45 days of receiving a copy of the order made by the Controller or adjudicating officer.
If an appeal is filed after that period, the Appellate Tribunal may still hear the delayed appeal if the appellant shows reason for the delay.
Exception to the Right of Appeal
As per Section 57: no appeal lies from an order made by an adjudicating officer when the parties have agreed to it.
So the right to appeal is limited by the rules and exceptions in the Information Technology Act.
Appeal From TDSAT to the High Court
The appellate process does not always end at TDSAT. Section 62 of the Information Technology Act allows an appeal from a decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal to the High Court on a question of law.
The appeal must usually be filed within 60 days of receiving a copy of the Appellate Tribunal’s decision or order.
The High Court may allow up to 60 days if it finds the appellant had a good reason to be late. This provides another remedy for qualifying questions of law.
Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 61
Section 61 of the Information Technology Act bars courts in cases that the Appellate Tribunal or an adjudicating officer can decide.
This does not mean every technology or cybersecurity dispute must begin before TDSAT. The right forum depends on the type of dispute, the authority involved, and the rules in the Information Technology Act.
When Section 57 applies, an eligible appeal can be filed against an order of the Controller or an adjudicating officer before the Appellate Tribunal, now TDSAT.
Current Status of Cyber Appeals in India
The Cyber Appellate Tribunal is now a historical tribunal rather than a standalone appellate body.
Since 26 May 2017, TDSAT has exercised the relevant appellate jurisdiction under the Information Technology Act. Therefore, readers looking for the current appellate forum for eligible IT Act matters should refer to TDSAT rather than CAT.
This distinction is particularly important when using older legal resources that continue to refer to the Cyber Appellate Tribunal.
Conclusion
The Cyber Appellate Tribunal was established under the Information Technology Act, 2000 as an appellate forum for specified matters arising under the Act. It was not established as a criminal court to punish cybercriminals.
The tribunal framework changed in 2017. With effect from 26 May 2017, the Finance Act, 2017 amended the Information Technology Act and designated the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) as the Appellate Tribunal for the IT Act.
Today, eligible appeals under Section 57 are handled by the Appellate Tribunal, which is TDSAT. Section 61 limits civil court jurisdiction in matters covered by the statutory bar, while Section 62 provides an appeal to the High Court on a question of law.
If you want to build cybersecurity skills, you can join Intellipaat’s Cyber Security Course with Placement in collaboration with iHub IIT Roorkee. In this course, you will learn cybersecurity concepts, tools, and practices through training and real-world practice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. What is the difference between CAT and TDSAT?
CAT was the Cyber Appellate Tribunal established under the Information Technology Act of 2000. Since 26 May 2017, TDSAT has taken over the jurisdiction that CAT once held under the IT Act.
Q2. Does TDSAT deal with cybersecurity cases?
No. TDSAT does not deal with cybersecurity cases. TDSAT has a statutory role that goes beyond matters under the Information Technology Act. TDSAT also handles disputes and appeals that are assigned to it under telecommunications laws and other applicable laws.
Q3. Who can file an appeal under the Information Technology Act?
A person aggrieved by an order from the Controller or an adjudicating officer can file an appeal under Section 57 of the IT Act. The appeal must meet the requirements and limits set by the IT Act.
Q4. What happens if an appeal under the IT Act is filed after 45 days?
If an appeal under the IT Act is filed after 45 days, the Appellate Tribunal may still accept it if the person filing the appeal shows a reason for the delay. Thus, the 45-day period is not a rule that stops all appeals.
Q5. Where can I appeal an order under the Information Technology Act?
If you have a qualifying order from the Controller or an adjudicating officer, you can appeal it to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 57 of the IT Act. Since 26 May 2017, TDSAT has acted as the Appellate Tribunal for these appeals. You must follow the specific rules and exceptions provided in the IT Act.