Monolithic vs Microservices Architecture

When building a software application, the way the application is structured plays an important role in how it performs, scales, and gets updates over time. Two of the most commonly used software architectures are Monolithic Architecture and Microservices Architecture. Each has its respective advantages and disadvantages, and their usage depends on the types of projects based on business needs. In this blog, you will explore the differences between Monolithic Architecture and Microservices Architecture in detail.

Table of Contents:

• What is a Monolithic Architecture?
• What is a Microservices Architecture?
• Monolithic Architecture vs Microservices Architecture: Key Differences
• Key Features of Monolithic Architecture
• Advantages and Disadvantages of Monolithic Architecture
• Key Features of Microservices Architecture
• Advantages and Disadvantages of Microservices Architecture
• Use Cases of Monolithic and Microservices Architectures.
• Tools and Technologies Used
• Conclusion

What is a Monolithic Architecture?

Monolithic architecture is the traditional approach to software application development. In a monolithic application, the entire application is developed as a single unit. All components of the application, including the user interface, business logic, and database access, are combined and executed together.

Example: For example, on a shopping platform, the user login page, product catalog, payment system, and order tracker are all built together in a single application file.

What is a Microservices Architecture?

Microservices architecture is a newer way to design applications. Instead of one large system, the application is broken down into small, separate parts. Each part is referred to as a microservice and handles one feature or function.

Example: Using the same shopping website example, microservices would have separate services for login, product search, payment, and delivery, and all run independently and communicate with each other.

Become a Job-Ready Software Engineer

Master coding, system design, and real-world projects with expert mentors. Get certified and land your dream tech job

Explore Program

Monolithic Architecture vs Microservices: Key Differences

Key Features of Monolithic Architecture

1. Single Codebase: The whole code is in one large file or project.
2. Unified Deployment: The full app is deployed in a single action.
3. Tightly Coupled: All modules are tightly connected and dependent.
4. Shared Resources: Uses one database and shared libraries.
5. Simple Communication: The modules communicate via internal method calls rather than external APIs.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Monolithic Architecture

Monolithic architecture offers several benefits, particularly for small teams and simple applications. However, as the application grows, it can face disadvantages such as reduced scalability and harder maintenance.

Advantages:

1. Simple to Develop: Developing an app in a monolithic form is easier because all features are together, eliminating the need to separate services or decide their placement.
2. Faster Development in the Beginning: With all the code in one place, testing and integration can be done quickly.
3. Simple Testing: Testing the entire application is straightforward, as it can be run as a single unit.
4. Easy Deployment: Only one package needs to be deployed when updating the code, making the process faster than microservices.
5. Lower Initial Costs: With a single codebase, development and infrastructure costs are usually lower at the start.

Disadvantages:

1. Hard to Maintain: As the application grows, the codebase can become large and difficult to manage. Even small changes may require testing the entire application.
2. Not Scalable: Individual features cannot be scaled independently; the entire application must be scaled, which consumes more resources.
3. Slow Deployment: Fixing even a minor bug requires rebuilding and redeploying the whole application.
4. Risk of Full Failure: If one component crashes, the entire application may fail since all components are tightly connected.
5. Limited Flexibility: Adapting to new technologies or frameworks is challenging due to the tight coupling of components.

Key Features of Microservices Architecture

1. Independent Services: Modules and features of the application are independent and work as different services.
2. Loose Coupling: Changes in one service do not affect other services because all services are loosely coupled.
3. Specific Functionality: Each service or module of the application focuses on a single task.
4. API-Based Communication: APIs like REST help the loosely coupled services to communicate with each other.
5. Scalable Components: Each service can be scaled independently according to demand, improving resource efficiency.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Microservices Architecture

Microservices architecture offers many benefits that help teams build applications efficiently. It allows faster development, easy scalability, and simpler maintenance. However, like any architecture, it has drawbacks. Managing a large number of small, independent services can be complex and challenging. Below, we explore the key advantages and disadvantages in detail.

Advantages:

1. Scalability: Individual services can be scaled independently according to requirements.
2. Elasticity: Each team can use any programming language or database for different services.
3. Faster Development: Separation of teams enables them to work on different services at the same time, which helps in accelerating development.
4. Improved Fault Isolation: The other services can be available in case one of them goes offline.
5. Easier Maintenance: A small codebase is more manageable, and updating it does not break the entire application.

Disadvantages:

1. Complex Setup: It is more complicated to set up and manage multiple services than to handle a large app.
2. More Testing Required: Each service’s functionality needs to be tested both individually and in combination, which can be time-consuming.
3. Problem in Managing Data: It can be challenging to address data consistency across services, as well as across databases.
4. Latency and Network Load: Services communicate over the network. Hence, there will be a delay and increased data traffic.
5. Debugging and Monitoring: Debugging issues is more challenging when working with multiple services.

Use Cases of Monolithic and Microservices Architectures

Let’s explore the scenarios where a monolithic architecture is used:

• Simple or small applications: It can be used where the number of applications is limited and has a smaller number of users.
• Startups or new projects: Monolithic architecture is suitable for startups and new team members, which helps to get the product ready quickly without worrying about initial setup.

Let’s explore the scenarios where a microservices architecture is used: 

• Large or complex applications: Microservices are best suited for systems with many features or services, for example, online shopping platforms or streaming apps.
• Scalable applications: Best suited for apps that need to cope with increased traffic or users. You can only scale parts that need more power, without scaling the whole system.

Tools and Technologies Used

Let’s now see the tools and technologies used in monolithic and microservices architectures.

Monolithic Architecture

Common Tools & Frameworks:

1. Backend Languages: Java (Spring Boot), C#, Python (Django), PHP (Laravel).
2. Frontend Integration: HTML/CSS/JS (served directly from the backend).
3. Database: MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle.
4. Server: Apache, Nginx, Tomcat.
5. Deployment: WAR files, JAR files, Docker (single container).
6. Monitoring & Logging: ELK Stack, Prometheus + Grafana, New Relic.

Best For:

1. Small to medium-sized applications.
2. Teams that prefer a unified codebase.
3. Projects with limited scaling needs.

Microservices Architecture

Common Tools & Frameworks:

1. Backend Languages: Java (Spring Boot), Node.js, Go, .NET Core, Python (Flask/FastAPI)
2. API Communication: REST, gRPC, GraphQL
3. Service Management: Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, Istio (Service Mesh)
4. CI/CD: Jenkins, GitLab CI, ArgoCD
5. Database: Polyglot persistence (e.g., MongoDB for one service, PostgreSQL for another)
6. Monitoring & Observability: Prometheus, Jaeger (Tracing), Fluentd, Grafana

Best For:

1. Large-scale, complex systems
2. Teams are working independently on different modules
3. Systems requiring high scalability and availability

Conclusion

Both monolithic and microservices architectures have their own strengths and weaknesses. Monolithic architecture excels in simplicity and ease of development, making it ideal for small to medium-sized projects. Microservices, on the other hand, are better suited for large, scalable systems that benefit from modularity, independent deployment, and flexibility. Choosing the right approach depends on factors such as team size, application complexity, and future growth plans. Many organisations start with a monolithic design and later transition to microservices as the system grows and the need for maintainability and modularity increases.

Take your skills to the next level by enrolling in the Software Engineering Course today and gaining hands-on experience. Also, prepare for job interviews with Software Engineering Interview Questions prepared by industry experts.

Also, check out our other blogs related to operating systems:

Monolithic vs Microservices Architecture – FAQs