Intellipaat
Intellipaat

Spark vs. MapReduce: Who is Winning?

Both the technologies are equipped with amazing features, however with the increased need of real-time analytics, these two giving tough competition to each other. Read a comparative analysis of these two in this blog!

Spark vs. MapReduce: Who is Winning?
 1204 Views     3 Comments

Big data is everywhere. Wait till 2020 and you will have over 50 billion connected devices to the internet thanks to the internet of things. All this means one thing – data on a scale that is unprecedented in the history of humankind. We all know that 90% of the data that is in existence today was created in the last two years alone.

All this means there needs to be a radical new way to handle all that data, process it in hitherto unheard volumes and derive meaningful insights from it to help businesses leap forward in this unforgiving corporate scenario. This is where the argument comes into picture. Whether the Apache MapReduce has run its course and is being taken over by a nimbler rival technology like the Apache Spark.

Learn Spark in 15 hrs. Download e-book now

X

Some of interesting facts about these two technologies are –

  • Spark machine learning abilities are obtained by MLlib
  • Apache Spark can be embedded in any OS
  • Execution of a Map task is followed by a Reduce task to produce the final output
  • Output from Map task is written to local disk while the output from Reduce is written to HDFS.

Spark vs. MapReduce

Let’s compare these two technologies in detail –

Spark key features Apache Spark Hadoop MapReduce
Speed Ten to hundred times faster than MapReduce Slower
Analytics Supports streaming, machine learning, complex analytics, etc Simple Map and Reduce tasks
Suitable for Real-time streaming Batch processing
Coding Lesser lines of code More lines of code
Processing location In-memory Local disk

Prepare yourself for the high-paying Hadoop jobs with these Top MapReduce Interview Questions and Answers!

Wish to Learn Spark? Click Here

What are MapReduce and Spark?

The above difference clearly points out that Apache Spark is way better than Hadoop MapReduce or in other words, more suitable for the real-time analytics. However it would be interesting to know that what makes Spark better than MapReduce. But before that you should what exactly these technologies are. Read below-

MapReduce is a methodology for processing huge amounts of data in a parallel and distributed setting. The two tasks that are undertaken in the MapReduce programming are the Mapper and the Reducer. Mapper takes up the job of sorting the data that is available and the Reducer is entrusted with the task of  combining the data and converting it into smaller chunks.  MapReduce along with HDFS and YARN are the three important components of Hadoop systems.

Spark is a new and rapidly growing open source technology that works very well on cluster of computer nodes. Speed is one of the hallmarks of Apache Spark. The developers working in this environment get an application programming interface that is based on the framework of RDD (Resilient Distributed Dataset). RDD is nothing but the abstraction provided by Spark that lets you segregate nodes into smaller divisions on the cluster in order to independently process the data.

Grab a big data job today with these Top Apache Spark Interview questions!

Download latest questions asked on Spark in top MNC's ?

What makes MapReduce stay behind in the race?

Till now you must have gotten a clear picture of Spark and MapReduce workflows. It is clear that MapReduce is not suitable according to the evolving real-time big data needs. Following are the reasons behind this fact –

difference-between-mapreduce-and-spark_a

  • The response time today has to be super fast
  • There are scenarios when the data from the graph has to be extracted
  • Sometimes the mapping generates a lot of keys which takes time to sort
  • There are times when diverse sets of data need to be combined
  • When there is machine learning involved then this technology fails
  • For repeated processing of data it takes too much for the iterations
  • For tasks that have to be cascaded there are a lot of inefficiencies involved

Want to get an in-depth knowledge? Read this extensive MapReduce Tutorial!

Wish to Learn Spark? Click Here

How Spark has an edge over MapReduce?

Some of the Apache Spark benefits over Hadoop MapReduce are given below –

Feature Of Spark

  • Processing at high speeds – The process of Spark execution can be up to 100 times faster due to its inherent ability to exploit the memory rather than using the disk storage. MapReduce has a big drawback since it has to operate with the entire set of data in the Hadoop Distributed File System on completion of each task. This increases the time and the cost of processing the data.
  • Caching on the fly – When dealing with Big Data there is a lot of caching involved and this increases the workload using MapReduce but Spark does it in-memory.
  • Increased iteration cycles – There is a need to work on the same data again and again especially n the machine learning scenarios and this makes Spark perfectly suitable for such applications.
  • Multiple operations using in-built libraries – MapReduce is capable of using the in-built libraries for the batch processing tasks. Spark provides the option of utilizing the in-built libraries to build interactive queries in SQL, machine learning, streaming and batch processing among other things.

Explore more about this trending big data engine by reading this Spark Tutorial!

Some other obvious benefits of Spark over MapReduce

Spark is not tied to Hadoop unlike MapReduce which cannot work outside of Hadoop. So there are talks going around with subject matter experts claiming that Spark might one day even phase out Hadoop but it’s still a long way away.Spark lets you write the application in a language of your choice like Java, Python, and so on. It supports streaming data, SQL queries, extensive use of data analytics in order to make sense of the data and even the possibility of machine led learning like the IBM Watson cognitive computing technology to take over.

Bottom line

Spark is able to access diverse data sources and make sense of them all. This is especially important in a world where IoT is gaining a steady groundswell. Thus machine to machine communications will amount for the bulk of data in the not so distant future. This means MapReduce is not up to the challenge to take on the big data exigencies of the future.

In the race to achieve the fastest way of doing things, using the least amount of resources there will always be a clash of the titans. The future belongs to those technologies that are nimble, adaptable, resourceful, and most of all that which can cater to the diverse needs of enterprises without a hitch and Apache Spark seems to be ticking all the boxes and looks like the future belongs to it.

Get enrolled in Online Apache Spark Certification Training Course today and excel in your career!

 

Related Articles

Suggested Articles

  • sheelam khan

    Thanks for sharing the informative article. I have to agree that it is a collaboration rather than a competition even just on purely a storage engine vs processing engine use case. Combination of hadoop + spark is very useful.

  • Alexane

    Very Crisp Comparison. Spark is becoming a good alternative for MapReduce typically on micro-batch use case, however it is still not winning the game in comparison to other tools when comes to real-time processing in some scenarios.

  • Anika

    Mapreduce paradigm is very limited for many machine learning tasks. Apache Spark is an excellent approach.