Elasticsearch vs. MongoDB: 5 Key Differences

Elasticsearch-vs-MongoDB.png

Elasticsearch vs MongoDB is a common comparison when teams evaluate NoSQL technologies for modern applications. While both handle large volumes of data, they are built for very different use cases.

MongoDB is a document-oriented NoSQL database used for data storage and CRUD operations, whereas Elasticsearch is a distributed search engine designed for full-text search, filtering, and real-time analytics.

In this blog, we compare Elasticsearch vs MongoDB, explain their key differences, use cases, and help you decide when to use MongoDB, Elasticsearch, or both together.

Table of Contents

What is MongoDB?

MongoDB is an open-source, document-oriented NoSQL database used to store and manage large volumes of structured and semi-structured data. It stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents, making it suitable for modern, scalable applications.

Key characteristics of MongoDB:

  • Document-based data model using BSON (Binary JSON)
  • Schema flexibility for evolving application requirements
  • High performance for read and write operations
  • Built-in replication for high availability
  • Horizontal scaling through sharding

MongoDB is commonly used as the primary database in applications that require flexible data storage, fast CRUD operations, and easy scalability.

Get 100% Hike!

Master Most in Demand Skills Now!

What is ElasticSearch?

ElasticSearch is a distributed, open-source search and analytics engine built on Apache Lucene. It is designed to store, search, and analyze large volumes of structured and unstructured data in near real-time.

Key features of Elasticsearch:

  • Handles full-text search and complex queries efficiently
  • Supports scalable, distributed data storage across multiple nodes
  • Offers real-time analytics on large datasets
  • Flexible indexing for structured and unstructured data
  • Often paired with other databases (like MongoDB) for enhanced search capabilities

Elasticsearch is widely used in log analysis, e-commerce search, enterprise search, and monitoring applications because it enables users to retrieve and analyze data quickly and efficiently.

Difference Between Elasticsearch and MongoDB

Even though they may seem like different applications of similar technologies, Elasticsearch and MongoDB have important differences. Here is a table that contrasts and compares, Elasticsearch and MongoDB:

Elasticsearch MongoDB
Distributed search and analytics engine built on Apache Lucene Document-oriented NoSQL database designed for flexible data storage
Primarily written in Java Primarily written in C++
Stores data as JSON documents optimized for indexing and search Stores data as BSON documents (binary JSON) optimized for storage and retrieval
Best suited for full-text search, filtering, and real-time analytics Best suited for CRUD operations and transactional workloads
Excels at text search, relevance scoring, and aggregations Excels at schema flexibility, scalability, and high write performance
Not recommended as a primary transactional data store Commonly used as the primary database in applications
Often used alongside another database for search and analytics Often paired with Elasticsearch to add advanced search capabilities

Learn how to perform text search in MongoDB effectively through this blog.

When to Use Elasticsearch vs MongoDB

Choosing between Elasticsearch and MongoDB depends less on popularity and more on what problem you are trying to solve.

Use Elasticsearch when:

  • You need fast full-text search with relevance scoring
  • Your application involves search-heavy workloads (logs, analytics, product search)
  • You require real-time indexing and querying
  • Use cases of Elasticsearch include:
    • Log and event analysis
    • Application performance monitoring
    • Search engines and autocomplete features
    • Text-based analytics

In short, Elasticsearch shines when search speed and query flexibility matter more than transactional consistency.

Use MongoDB when:

  • You need a primary database for your application
  • Your data is semi-structured or rapidly evolving
  • You require CRUD operations at scale
  • Use cases of MongoDB include:
    • User profiles and session data
    • Content management systems
    • E-commerce catalogs
    • Mobile and web applications

MongoDB is better suited for application data storage, where reliability, scalability, and schema flexibility are key.

Can Elasticsearch Replace MongoDB?

This is a common question, and the short answer is: No, not completely.

Can Elasticsearch replace MongoDB?

Not reliably.

While Elasticsearch can store JSON documents, it:

  • Is not designed as a primary database
  • Lacks strong transactional guarantees
  • Is optimized for search and retrieval, not frequent updates

Using Elasticsearch alone for application data can lead to data consistency and durability issues.

Can MongoDB replace Elasticsearch?

Partially, but with limitations.

MongoDB supports:

  • Basic text search
  • Indexing and filtering

However, it falls short when you need:

  • Advanced relevance scoring
  • Complex search queries
  • High-performance full-text search at scale

For search-heavy applications, MongoDB cannot match Elasticsearch’s performance or capabilities.

Elasticsearch Advantages and Disadvantages

Let’s discuss in detail the advantages and disadvantages of Elasticsearch below:

1. Advantages of Elasticsearch

  • Various types of searches, including those using structured, unstructured, geospatial, and metric data, can be carried out and combined.
  • Data can be obtained via a query in any format needed.
  • Elasticsearch is possible to quickly evaluate billions of records.
  • Additionally, it offers aggregates for investigating data trends and patterns.
  • Even from very large data sets, Elasticsearch finds the best matches for your full-text searches quickly.

2. Disadvantages of Elasticsearch

  • Split-brain issues can occasionally arise in Elasticsearch.
  • With the exception of Apache Solr, Elasticsearch is unable to manage request and response data in several languages.
  • Elasticsearch is a terrible alternative for a data store compared to other options like MongoDB, Hadoop, etc.
  • It is a powerful and flexible distributed database search engine, but it can be difficult to comprehend.
  • Particularly in terms of office search usage, it is not as simple as a box search.

MongoDB Advantages and Disadvantages

Let’s see the Advantages and Disadvantages of MongoDB which are given below:

1. Advantages of MongoDB

  • We have the freedom and flexibility to store various types of data due to MongoDB.
  • By dividing it over numerous servers linked to the program, we can store a lot of data.
  • MongoDB is 100 times faster than a relational database in terms of speed.
  • Replication and GridFS are functionalities available in MongoDB. These aspects contribute to MongoDB’s increased data availability.
  • The fact that MongoDB is a horizontally scalable database is a huge benefit.

2. Disadvantages of MongoDB

  • Like a relational database, MongoDB does not support joins.
  • Data redundancy exists as a result of the lack of capability. As a result, memory is used more frequently than necessary.
  • Your document size is limited to 16 MB.
  • More than 100 levels of document nesting are not permitted.
  • Performance issues and slow execution are possible with MongoDB.

Real World Use Case of Elasticsearch and MongoDB

Elasticsearch and MongoDB are commonly used in different parts of modern data architectures. Below are practical, real-world use cases that highlight where each tool is most effective.

Real-World Use Cases of Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch is widely used in scenarios that require fast search, filtering, and analysis of large datasets.

  • Log Analysis and Monitoring
    Elasticsearch is a popular choice for indexing and searching application logs, system events, and security data due to its speed and scalability.
  • Aggregating and Indexing Data from Multiple Sources
    It can collect and organize data from APIs, public feeds, and external systems, making it easier to analyze diverse datasets in a unified way.
  • Full-Text Search and Discovery
    Elasticsearch is commonly used for full-text search in e-commerce platforms, document repositories, and enterprise search applications where relevance and speed are critical.

Real-World Use Cases of MongoDB

MongoDB is well-suited for applications that need flexible data storage and high write performance.

  • Large-Scale Identity and Profile Data
    MongoDB is used in systems that manage massive volumes of structured and semi-structured user data at scale.
  • Media and Content Storage
    Applications that handle large files, images, and metadata often rely on MongoDB for efficient storage and retrieval.
  • Enterprise Applications and Customer Platforms
    MongoDB supports complex, evolving data models commonly found in financial services, customer support platforms, and global enterprise systems.

In many real-world applications, MongoDB serves as the primary data store while Elasticsearch is used alongside it to provide fast search and analytics, allowing teams to take advantage of both systems without overlap.

Become a Business Intelligence Architect

Conclusion

Elasticsearch vs MongoDB each excel in different areas. MongoDB is ideal for flexible document storage, high-volume CRUD operations, and scalable applications, while Elasticsearch is best for fast full-text search, real-time analytics, and log monitoring.

In many real-world applications, these technologies are used together, with MongoDB as the primary database and Elasticsearch powering search and analytics. By understanding their strengths, you can choose the right tool for your use case and build efficient, high-performing systems.

Related BlogsWhat’s Inside
Data Warehouse Interview QuestionsProvides data warehouse questions for mastering data analytics roles.
Cassandra Interview QuestionsDetails Cassandra questions for excelling in NoSQL database interviews.
DynamoDB vs MongoDBCompares DynamoDB and MongoDB for their NoSQL database strengths.
Firebase vs MongoDBContrasts Firebase versus MongoDB for real-time and NoSQL database needs.
Redis vs MongoDBOutlines Redis and MongoDB differences for in-memory and NoSQL databases.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can Elasticsearch replace MongoDB in all applications?

No. Elasticsearch is optimized for search and analytics, while MongoDB is designed for document storage and CRUD operations. In many cases, they complement each other rather than replace each other.

2. Which is faster for full-text search, MongoDB or Elasticsearch?

Elasticsearch is specifically built for fast full-text search and can handle complex queries across large datasets much faster than MongoDB.

3. Is MongoDB suitable for real-time analytics?

MongoDB can perform analytics, but it is primarily a NoSQL document store. For real-time search and analytics, Elasticsearch is more efficient.

4. Can I use Elasticsearch and MongoDB together?

Yes. A common pattern is to use MongoDB as the main database and Elasticsearch for search and analytics, allowing applications to benefit from both storage and fast querying.

5. Which database is better for scaling large applications?

Both are scalable. MongoDB supports horizontal scaling via sharding, while Elasticsearch is distributed by design, making it ideal for high-volume search and analytics tasks.

About the Author

Data Engineer, Tata Steel Nederland

As a skilled Data Engineer, Sahil excels in SQL, NoSQL databases, Business Intelligence, and database management. He has contributed immensely to projects at companies like Bajaj and Tata. With a strong expertise in data engineering, he has architected numerous solutions for data pipelines, analytics, and software integration, driving insights and innovation.